Language-Informed Visual Concept Learning
Sharon Lee, Yunzhi Zhang, Shangzhe Wu, Jiajun Wu
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Our understanding of the visual world is centered around various concept axes, characterizing different aspects of visual entities. While different concept axes can be easily specified by language, e.g., color, the exact visual nuances along each axis often exceed the limitations of linguistic articulations, e.g., a particular style of painting. In this work, our goal is to learn a language-informed visual concept representation, by simply distilling large pre-trained vision-language models. Specifically, we train a set of concept encoders to encode the information pertinent to a set of language-informed concept axes, with an objective of reproducing the input image through a pre-trained Text-to-Image (T2I) model. To encourage better disentanglement of different concept encoders, we anchor the concept embeddings to a set of text embeddings obtained from a pre-trained Visual Question Answering (VQA) model. At inference time, the model extracts concept embeddings along various axes from new test images, which can be remixed to generate images with novel compositions of visual concepts. With a lightweight test-time finetuning procedure, it can also generalize to novel concepts unseen at training. Project page at https://cs.stanford.edu/~yzzhang/projects/concept-axes.
Author context
Most prolific author: 8 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 30 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 52% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM G… ×8
- ▲ beat AutoHall: Automated Hallucination Dataset … ×4
- ▼ lost to On-Policy Distillation of Language Models:… ×4
- ▲ beat EditHOI: A framework for HOI image editing… ×4
- ▲ beat I Know You Did Not Write That! A Sampling … ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)