PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

EditHOI: A framework for HOI image editing with self-generated skeleton guidance

ChangHee Yang, Chan Hee Kang, Kyeongbo Kong, Hanni Oh, Suk-Ju Kang

generative modelsImage editingobject interaction human skeleton generation
10.80100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
14.70100
Mimo
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.39)
7.30100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.40)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Recently, there were remarkable advances in image editing tasks. This could be categorized into text-guided global editing, local editing, text-guided local editing. To resolve the flawed human generation problem in prior image editing models, we propose a novel skeleton and text-guided local editing framework, EditHOI. Our goal is to edit an image by synthesizing an object-interactive human in the image. To do this, our framework consists of two stages: the first stage generates object-interactive skeleton using diffusion-based module, while the second stage outputs a Human and Object Interaction (HOI) image based on skeleton and text guidance. For effective evaluation on a object-interactive skeleton, we designed joint parameter and two evaluation metrics; object interaction top-n accuracy and skeleton probability distance. The excellent performance of our framework is demonstrated through experiments qualitatively and quantitatively. Lastly, we show its applicability such as user controllable editing, generating pseudo SMPL ground truth and scalability to human-to-human interaction. The corresponding code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ HOI_editing_image-43F1/

Author context

Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 38 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 40% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)