PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

I Know You Did Not Write That! A Sampling Based Watermarking Method for Identifying Machine Generated Text

Kaan Efe Keleş, kaan.gurbuz@bilkent.edu.tr, Mucahid Kutlu

generative modelslarge language modelsdetecting machine generated textwatermarking text
10.00100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
10.70100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)
10.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±18 pct pts (from σ = 0.37)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — embedding a watermark into machine generated text to reliably detect it afterwards

Abstract

Potential harms of Large Language Models such as mass misinformation and plagiarism can be partially mitigated if there exists a reliable way to detect machine generated text. In this paper, we propose a new watermarking method to detect machine-generated texts. Our method embeds a unique pattern within the generated text, ensuring that while the content remains coherent and natural to human readers, it carries distinct markers that can be identified algorithmically. Specifically, we intervene with the token sampling process in a way which enables us to trace back our token choices during the detection phase. We show how watermarking affects textual quality and compare our proposed method with a state-of-the-art watermarking method in terms of robustness and detectability. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our watermarking scheme in distinguishing between watermarked and non-watermarked text, achieving high detection rates while maintaining textual quality.

Author context

Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 38 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 34% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)