PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Uncertainty-Aware Decision Transformer for Stochastic Driving Environments

Zenan Li, Fan Nie, Qiao Sun, Fang Da, Hang Zhao

robotics & planningAutonomous DrivingDecision TransformerUncertainty Estimation
42.80100
Fused
band ≈ ±13 pct pts (from σ = 0.26)
47.90100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.40)
42.30100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±18 pct pts (from σ = 0.35)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We present an uncertainty-aware decision transformer to maximize cumulative rewards at certain states but plan cautiously at states with stochastic environment transitions.

Abstract

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising framework for learning policies without active interactions, making it especially appealing for autonomous driving tasks. Recent successes of Transformers inspire casting offline RL as sequence modeling, which performs well in long-horizon tasks. However, they are overly optimistic in stochastic environments with incorrect assumptions that the same goal can be consistently achieved by identical actions. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty-aware decision transformer (UNREST) for planning in stochastic driving environments without introducing additional transition or complex generative models. Specifically, UNREST estimates state uncertainties by the conditional mutual information between transitions and returns, and segments sequences accordingly. Discovering the 'uncertainty accumulation' and 'temporal locality' properties of driving environments, UNREST replaces the global returns in decision transformers with less uncertain truncated returns, to learn from true outcomes of agent actions rather than environment transitions. We also dynamically evaluate environmental uncertainty during inference for cautious planning. Extensive experimental results demonstrate UNREST's superior performance in various driving scenarios and the power of our uncertainty estimation strategy.

Author context

Most prolific author: 9 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 42)