PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

ZeroFlow: Scalable Scene Flow via Distillation

Kyle Vedder, Neehar Peri, Nathaniel Eliot Chodosh, Ishan Khatri, ERIC EATON, Dinesh Jayaraman, Yang Liu, Deva Ramanan, James Hays

robotics & planningScene FlowDistillationScaling
98.80100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.31)
98.50100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)
99.50100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±23 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We propose a scalable, human annotation-free distillation pipeline that captures state-of-the-art by leveraging raw data.

Abstract

Scene flow estimation is the task of describing the 3D motion field between temporally successive point clouds. State-of-the-art methods use strong priors and test-time optimization techniques, but require on the order of tens of seconds to process full-size point clouds, making them unusable as computer vision primitives for real-time applications such as open world object detection. Feedforward methods are considerably faster, running on the order of tens to hundreds of milliseconds for full-size point clouds, but require expensive human supervision. To address both limitations, we propose _Scene Flow via Distillation_, a simple, scalable distillation framework that uses a label-free optimization method to produce pseudo-labels to supervise a feedforward model. Our instantiation of this framework, _ZeroFlow_, achieves **state-of-the-art** performance on the _Argoverse 2 Self-Supervised Scene Flow Challenge_ while using zero human labels by simply training on large-scale, diverse unlabeled data. At test-time, ZeroFlow is over 1000$\times$ faster than label-free state-of-the-art optimization-based methods on full-size point clouds (34 FPS vs 0.028 FPS) and over 1000$\times$ cheaper to train on unlabeled data compared to the cost of human annotation (\\$394 vs ~\\$750,000). To facilitate further research, we will release our code, trained model weights, and high quality pseudo-labels for the Argoverse 2 and Waymo Open datasets.

Author context

Most prolific author: 7 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)