PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Pay attention to cycle for spatio-temporal graph neural network

Yun Young Choi, Minho Lee, Sun Woo Park, Seunghwan Lee, Joohwan Ko

self/semi-supervised learningGraph Neural NetworkTraffic forecastSpatio-Temporal GraphMultilayer perceptron
24.70100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
21.00100
Mimo
band ≈ ±18 pct pts (from σ = 0.36)
24.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Transformer have been increasingly adopted to learn the complex vector representations of spatio-temporal graphs, capturing intricate spatio-temporal dependencies crucial for applications such as traffic datasets. Although many existing methods utilize multi-head attention mechanisms and message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) to capture both spatial and temporal relations, these approaches encode temporal and spatial relations independently, and reflect the graph's topological characteristics in a limited manner. In this work, we introduce the Cycle to Mixer (Cy2Mixer), a novel spatio-temporal GNN based on topological non-trivial invariants of spatio-temporal graphs with gated multi-layer perceptrons (gMLP). The Cy2Mixer is composed of three blocks based on MLPs: A message-passing block for encapsulating spatial information: a cycle message-passing block for enriching topological information through cyclic subgraphs: And a temporal block for capturing temporal properties. We bolster the effectiveness of Cy2Mixer with mathematical evidence emphasizing that our cycle message-passing block is capable of offering differentiated information to the deep learning model compared to the message-passing block. Furthermore, empirical evaluations substantiate the efficacy of the Cy2Mixer, demonstrating state-of-the-art performances across various traffic benchmark datasets.

Author context

Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 40 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 43% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 40)