← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

NewTime: Numerically Multi-Scaled Embedding for Large-Scale Time Series Pretraining

Chenguo Lin, Xumeng Wen, Wei Cao, Congrui Huang, Jiang Bian, Stephen Lin, Zhirong Wu

self/semi-supervised learningtime seriesself-supervised pretrainingdata encodingrepresentation learning
87.20100
Fused
band ≈ ±16 pct pts (from σ = 0.33)
83.70100
Mimo
band ≈ ±24 pct pts (from σ = 0.47)
85.50100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We propose a numerically multi-scaled embedding method to enable large-scale self-supervised pretraining on time-series data.

Abstract

Recent research on time-series self-supervised models shows great promise in learning semantic representations. However, it has been limited to small-scale datasets, e.g., thousands of temporal sequences. In this work, we make key technical contributions that are tailored to the numerical properties of time-series data and allow the model to scale to large datasets, e.g., millions of temporal sequences. We adopt the Transformer architecture by first partitioning the input into non-overlapping windows. Each window is then characterized by its normalized shape and two scalar values denoting the mean and standard deviation within each window. To embed scalar values that may possess arbitrary numerical scales to high-dimensional vectors, we propose a numerically multi-scaled embedding module enumerating all possible scales for the scalar values. The model undergoes pretraining using the proposed numerically multi-scaled embedding with a simple contrastive objective on a large-scale dataset containing over a million sequences. We study its transfer performance on a number of univariate and multivariate classification benchmarks. Our method exhibits remarkable improvement against previous representation learning approaches and establishes the new state of the art, even compared with domain-specific non-learning-based methods.

Author context

Most prolific author: 20 submissions (credibility 0.11).

Delta if applied: -1.9 percentile

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)