Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models
Mengkang Hu, Yao Mu, Xinmiao Chelsey Yu, Mingyu Ding, Shiguang Wu, Wenqi Shao, Qiguang Chen, Bin Wang, Yu Qiao, Ping Luo
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
This paper studies close-loop task planning, which refers to the process of generating a sequence of skills (a plan) to accomplish a specific goal while adapting the plan based on real-time observations. Recently, prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate actions iteratively has become a prevalent paradigm due to its superior performance and user-friendliness. However, this paradigm is plagued by two inefficiencies: high token consumption and redundant error correction, both of which hinder its scalability for large-scale testing and applications. To address these issues, we propose Tree-Planner, which reframes task planning with LLMs into three distinct phases: plan sampling, action tree construction, and grounded deciding. Tree-Planner starts by using an LLM to sample a set of potential plans before execution, followed by the aggregation of them to form an action tree. Finally, the LLM performs a top-down decision-making process on the tree, taking into account real-time environmental information. Experiments show that Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency. By decomposing LLM queries into a single plan-sampling call and multiple grounded-deciding calls, a considerable part of the prompt are less likely to be repeatedly consumed. As a result, token consumption is reduced by 92.2\% compared to the previously best-performing model. Additionally, by enabling backtracking on the action tree as needed, the correction process becomes more flexible, leading to a 40.5\% decrease in error corrections.
Author context
Most prolific author: 27 submissions (credibility 0.08).
Delta if applied: -2.3 percentile
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 40 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 51% of matchups.
- ▲ beat DoraemonGPT: Toward Solving Real-world Tas… ×6
- ▲ beat The Power of the Senses: Generalizable Man… ×6
- ▼ lost to Zero-Shot Robotic Manipulation with Pre-Tr… ×4
- ▲ beat MindAgent: Emergent Gaming Interaction ×4
- ▼ lost to Complete and continuous representations of… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 40)