PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Leveraging Low-Rank and Sparse Recurrent Connectivity for Robust Closed-Loop Control

Neehal Tumma, Mathias Lechner, Noel Loo, Ramin Hasani, Daniela Rus

representation learningLow-ranksparsityclosed-looprecurrent neural networks
23.10100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
20.20100
Mimo
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.38)
32.60100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — Low-rank and sparse recurrent matrices of RNNs can help generalization to closed-loop settings and distribution-shifts

Abstract

Developing autonomous agents that can interact with changing environments is an open challenge in machine learning. Robustness is particularly important in these settings as agents are often fit offline on expert demonstrations but deployed online where they must generalize to the closed feedback loop within the environment. In this work, we explore the application of recurrent neural networks to tasks of this nature and understand how a parameterization of their recurrent connectivity influences robustness in closed-loop settings. Specifically, we represent the recurrent connectivity as a function of rank and sparsity and show both theoretically and empirically that modulating these two variables has desirable effects on network dynamics. The proposed low-rank, sparse connectivity induces an interpretable prior on the network that proves to be most amenable for a class of models known as closed-form continuous-time neural networks (CfCs). We find that CfCs with fewer parameters can outperform their full-rank, fully-connected counterparts in the online setting under distribution shift. This yields memory-efficient and robust agents while opening a new perspective on how we can modulate network dynamics through connectivity.

Author context

Most prolific author: 5 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)