PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Signed-Binarization: Unlocking Efficiency Through Repetition-Sparsity Trade-Off

Sachit Kuhar, Yash Jain, Alexey Tumanov, Sujan Kumar Gonugondla

infrastructure & systemsRepresentation LearningQuantizationDNN Inference
33.70100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
31.60100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.44)
45.00100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — Signed-Binarization, a new framework, improves model inference efficiency while retaining competitive accuracy, by addressing newly identified repetition-sparsity trade-off; improves density, runtime & energy taken with competitive accuracy.

Abstract

Efficient inference of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) on resource-constrained edge devices is essential. Quantization and sparsity are key algorithmic techniques that translate to repetition and sparsity within tensors at the hardware-software interface. This paper introduces the concept of repetition-sparsity trade-off that helps explain computational efficiency during inference. We propose Signed Binarization, a unified co-design framework that synergistically integrates hardware-software systems, quantization functions, and representation learning techniques to address this trade-off. Our results demonstrate that Signed Binarization is more accurate than binary models with the same number of non-zero weights. Detailed analysis indicates that signed binarization generates a smaller distribution of effectual (non-zero) parameters nested within a larger distribution of total parameters, both of the same type, for a DNN block. Finally, our approach achieves a 26\% speedup on real hardware, doubles energy efficiency, and reduces density by 2.8x compared to binary methods for ResNet 18, presenting an alternative solution for deploying efficient models in resource-limited environments.

Author context

Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)