PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Long-Term Typhoon Trajectory Prediction: A Physics-Conditioned Approach Without Reanalysis Data

Young-Jae Park, Minseok Seo, Doyi Kim, Hyeri Kim, Sanghoon Choi, Beomkyu Choi, Jeongwon Ryu, Sohee Son, Hae-Gon Jeon, Yeji Choi

physical sciencesWeather ForecastingTyphoon Trajectory ForecastingTropical CycloneClimate Change
16.60100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.31)
18.20100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.44)
15.50100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — Real-time 72-hour typhoon trajectory prediction using the NWP model.

Abstract

In the face of escalating climate changes, typhoon intensities and their ensuing damage have surged. Accurate trajectory prediction is crucial for effective damage control. Traditional physics-based models, while comprehensive, are computationally intensive and rely heavily on the expertise of forecasters. Contemporary data-driven methods often rely on reanalysis data, which can be considered to be the closest to the true representation of weather conditions. However, reanalysis data is not produced in real-time and requires time for adjustment since prediction models are calibrated with observational data. This reanalysis data, such as ERA5, falls short in challenging real-world situations. Optimal preparedness necessitates predictions at least 72 hours in advance, beyond the capabilities of standard physics models. In response to these constraints, we present an approach that harnesses real-time Unified Model (UM) data, sidestepping the limitations of reanalysis data. Our model provides predictions at 6-hour intervals for up to 72 hours in advance and outperforms both state-of-the-art data-driven methods and numerical weather prediction models. In line with our efforts to mitigate adversities inflicted by \rthree{typhoons}, we release our preprocessed \textit{PHYSICS TRACK} dataset, which includes ERA5 reanalysis data, typhoon best-track, and UM forecast data.

Author context

Most prolific author: 3 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)