← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

MediTab: Scaling Medical Tabular Data Predictors via Data Consolidation, Enrichment, and Refinement

Zifeng Wang, Chufan Gao, Cao Xiao, Jimeng Sun

physical sciencestabular predictionlarge language modelAI for healthcare
57.30100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
59.00100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)
57.50100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We investigate pre-training a tabular prediction model on multi-source medical tabular data hence enabling strong few-shot and zero-shot predictions, for samples with varying features.

Abstract

Tabular data prediction has been employed in medical applications such as patient health risk prediction. However, existing methods usually revolve around the algorithm design while overlooking the significance of data engineering. Medical tabular datasets frequently exhibit significant heterogeneity across different sources, with limited sample sizes per source. As such, previous predictors are often trained on manually curated small datasets that struggle to generalize across different tabular datasets during inference. This paper proposes to scale medical tabular data predictors (MediTab) to various tabular inputs with varying features. The method uses a data engine that leverages large language models (LLMs) to consolidate tabular samples to overcome the barrier across tables with distinct schema. It also aligns out-domain data with the target task using a "learn, annotate, and refinement'' pipeline. The expanded training data then enables the pre-trained MediTab to infer for arbitrary tabular input in the domain without fine-tuning, resulting in significant improvements over supervised baselines: it reaches an average ranking of 1.57 and 1.00 on 7 patient outcome prediction datasets and 3 trial outcome prediction datasets, respectively. In addition, MediTab exhibits impressive zero-shot performances: it outperforms supervised XGBoost models by 8.9% and 17.2% on average in two prediction tasks, respectively.

Author context

Most prolific author: 14 submissions (credibility 0.57).

Delta if applied: -0.2 percentile

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)