Towards Minimal Targeted Updates of Language Models with Targeted Negative Training
Lily H Zhang, Rajesh Ranganath, Arya Tafvizi
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We propose Targeted Negative Training, a method to reduce the probability that a language model assigns to unwanted text while minimally changing model behavior otherwise.
Abstract
Generative models of language exhibit impressive capabilities but still place non-negligible probability mass over undesirable outputs. In this work, we address the task of updating a model to avoid unwanted outputs while minimally changing model behavior otherwise, a challenge we refer to as a minimal targeted update. We first formalize the notion of a minimal targeted update and propose a method to achieve such updates using negative examples from a model's generations. Our proposed Targeted Negative Training (TNT) results in updates that keep the new distribution close to the original, unlike existing losses for negative signal which push down probability but do not control what the updated distribution will be. In experiments, we demonstrate that TNT yields a better trade-off between reducing unwanted behavior and preserving model generation behavior than baselines, paving the way towards a modeling paradigm based on iterative training updates that constrain models from generating undesirable outputs while preserving their impressive capabilities.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 47% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Language Model Beats Diffusion - Tokenizer… ×4
- ▼ lost to Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memo… ×4
- ▲ beat MM-LDM: Multi-Modal Latent Diffusion Model… ×4
- ▲ beat Towards More Accurate Diffusion Model Acce… ×4
- ▲ beat Generative Pre-Trained Speech Language Mod… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)