PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Generative Pre-Trained Speech Language Model with Efficient Hierarchical Transformer

Yongxin Zhu, Dan Su, andylqhe@tencent.com, Linli Xu, Dong Yu

generative modelsspeech language modelspeech generation
69.80100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
73.80100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)
69.10100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.40)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

While recent advancements in speech language modeling have achieved significant progress, they face remarkable challenges in modelling the long acoustic sequence of neural audio codecs. Previous speech language models are compelled to learn acoustic tokens through a multi-stage generation process, which hinders their performance due to error propagation and information loss. In this paper, we introduce \textbf{G}enerative \textbf{P}re-Trained \textbf{S}peech Language Model (GPST), a hierarchical transformer designed for efficient speech language modeling. GPST quantizes audio waveforms into two distinct types of discrete speech representations and integrates them within a hierarchical transformer architecture, allowing for a unified one-stage generation process and enhancing Hi-Res audio generation capabilities. By training on large corpora of raw audio waveforms in an end-to-end unsupervised manner, GPST can generate syntactically consistent speech with diverse speaker identity unconditionally. When provided a brief 3-second prompt, GPST is able to produce natural and coherent personalized speech, demonstrating in-context learning abilities. Moreover, our approach can be easily extended to spoken cross-lingual speech generation by incorporating multi-lingual semantic tokens and universal acoustic tokens. Experimental results indicate that GPST significantly outperforms the existing speech language models in terms of word error rate, speech quality and speaker similarity.

Author context

Most prolific author: 6 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)