On the Vulnerability of Adversarially Trained Models Against Two-faced Attacks
Shengjie Zhou, Lue Tao, Yuzhou Cao, Tao Xiang, Bo An, Lei Feng
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We disclose that adversarially trained models are vulnerable to two-faced attacks, where slightly perturbed features of input data can make the model exhibit a false sense of robustness.
Abstract
Adversarial robustness is an important standard for measuring the quality of learned models, and adversarial training is an effective strategy for improving the adversarial robustness of models. In this paper, we disclose that adversarially trained models are vulnerable to two-faced attacks, where slight perturbations in input features are crafted to make the model exhibit a false sense of robustness in the verification phase. Such a threat is significantly important as it can mislead our evaluation of the adversarial robustness of models, which could cause unpredictable security issues when deploying substandard models in reality. More seriously, this threat seems to be pervasive and tricky: we find that many types of models suffer from this threat, and models with higher adversarial robustness tend to be more vulnerable. Furthermore, we provide the first attempt to formulate this threat, disclose its relationships with adversarial risk, and try to circumvent it via a simple countermeasure. These findings serve as a crucial reminder for practitioners to exercise caution in the verification phase, urging them to refrain from blindly trusting the exhibited adversarial robustness of models.
Author context
Most prolific author: 14 submissions (credibility 0.79).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 36 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 61% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Improving Robustness and Accuracy with Ret… ×6
- ▼ lost to Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial … ×4
- ▲ beat Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Training ×4
- ▲ beat Synaptic Weight Distributions Depend on th… ×4
- ▼ lost to CARSO: Blending Adversarial Training and P… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)