Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Training
Jiacheng Zhang, Feng Liu, Dawei Zhou, Jingfeng Zhang, Tongliang Liu
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Adversarial training (AT) is a well-known defensive framework that trains a model with generated adversarial examples (AEs). AEs are crafted by intentionally adding perturbations to the natural images, aiming to mislead the model into making erroneous outputs. In existing AT methods, the magnitude of perturbations is usually constrained by a predefined perturbation budget, denoted as $\epsilon$, and keeps the same on each dimension of the image (i.e., each pixel within an image). However, in this paper, we discover that not all pixels contribute equally to the accuracy on AEs (i.e., robustness) and accuracy on natural images (i.e., accuracy). Motivated by this finding, we propose a new framework called Pixel-reweighted AdveRsarial Training (PART), to partially lower $\epsilon$ for pixels that rarely influence the model's outputs, which guides the model to focus more on regions where pixels are important for model's outputs. Specifically, we first use class activation mapping (CAM) methods to identify important pixel regions, then we keep the perturbation budget for these regions while lowering it for the remaining regions when generating AEs. In the end, we use these reweighted AEs to train a model. PART achieves a notable improvement in the robustness-accuracy trade-off on CIFAR-10, SVHN and Tiny-ImageNet and serves as a general framework, seamlessly integrating with a variety of AT, CAM and AE generation methods. More importantly, our work revisits the conventional AT framework and justifies the necessity to allocate distinct weights to different pixel regions during AT.
Author context
Most prolific author: 35 submissions (credibility 0.05).
Delta if applied: -3.9 percentile
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 36 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 43% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial … ×4
- ▼ lost to CARSO: Blending Adversarial Training and P… ×4
- ▼ lost to On the Vulnerability of Adversarially Trai… ×4
- ▼ lost to On the Onset of Robust Overfitting in Adve… ×4
- ▼ lost to Improving Robustness and Accuracy with Ret… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)