Time-Varying Propensity Score to Bridge the Gap between the Past and Present
Rasool Fakoor, Jonas Mueller, Zachary Chase Lipton, Pratik Chaudhari, Alex Smola
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — To keep models accurate in the real world, we must regularly update them with relevant data. This paper proposes a new method for doing so.
Abstract
Real-world deployment of machine learning models is challenging because data evolves over time. While no model can work when data evolves in an arbitrary fashion, if there is some pattern to these changes, we might be able to design methods to address it. This paper addresses situations when data evolves gradually. We introduce a time-varying propensity score that can detect gradual shifts in the distribution of data which allows us to selectively sample past data to update the model---not just similar data from the past like that of a standard propensity score but also data that evolved in a similar fashion in the past. The time-varying propensity score is quite general: we demonstrate different ways of implementing it and evaluate it on a variety of problems ranging from supervised learning (e.g., image classification problems) where data undergoes a sequence of gradual shifts, to reinforcement learning tasks (e.g., robotic manipulation and continuous control) where data shifts as the policy or the task changes.
Author context
Most prolific author: 6 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 48% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Learning-Retrieval-Revision For Large Lang… ×6
- ▼ lost to Learning Transferable Robust Representatio… ×4
- ▼ lost to Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Met… ×4
- ▼ lost to Ask Your Distribution Shift if Pre-Trainin… ×4
- ▲ beat G-TIGRE: A new generative framework for Mu… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)