Task Planning for Visual Room Rearrangement under Partial Observability
Karan Mirakhor, Sourav Ghosh, Dipanjan Das, Brojeshwar Bhowmick
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
This paper presents a novel hierarchical task planner under partial observability that empowers an embodied agent to use visual input to efficiently plan a sequence of actions for simultaneous object search and rearrangement in an untidy room, to achieve a desired tidy state. The paper introduces (i) a novel Search Network that utilizes commonsense knowledge from large language models to find unseen objects, (ii) a Deep RL network trained with proxy reward, along with (iii) a novel graph-based state representation to produce a scalable and effective planner that interleaves object search and rearrangement to minimize the number of steps taken and overall traversal of the agent, as well as to resolve blocked goal and swap cases, and (iv) a sample-efficient cluster-biased sampling for simultaneous training of the proxy reward network along with the Deep RL network. Furthermore, the paper presents new metrics and a benchmark dataset - RoPOR, to measure the effectiveness of rearrangement planning. Experimental results show that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art rearrangement methods Weihs et al. (2021a); Gadre et al. (2022); Sarch et al. (2022); Ghosh et al. (2022).
Author context
Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 47% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to ZeroFlow: Scalable Scene Flow via Distilla… ×4
- ▼ lost to Compound Returns Reduce Variance in Reinfo… ×4
- ▲ beat Memory-efficient particle filter recurrent… ×4
- ▲ beat Dispatching Ambulances using Deep Reinforc… ×4
- ▲ beat RoboGPT : An intelligent agent of making e… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)