PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Text2Data: Low-Resource Data Generation with Textual Control

Shiyu Wang, Yihao Feng, Tian Lan, Ning Yu, Yu Bai, Ran Xu, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese

generative modelslow resourcetext-to-data generation
49.00100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
52.70100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
42.90100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We propose a method that can achieve text-to-data generation under low-resource situation.

Abstract

Natural language serves as a common and straightforward control signal for humans to interact seamlessly with machines. Recognizing the importance of this interface, the machine learning community is investing considerable effort in generating data that is semantically coherent with textual instructions. While strides have been made in text-to-data generation spanning image editing, audio synthesis, video creation, and beyond, low-resource areas characterized by expensive annotations or complex data structures, like molecules, motion dynamics, and time series, often lack textual labels. This deficiency impedes supervised learning, thereby constraining the application of advanced generative models for text-to-data tasks. In response to these challenges in the low-resource scenario, we propose Text2Data, a novel approach that utilizes unlabeled data to understand the underlying data distribution through an unsupervised diffusion model. Subsequently, it undergoes controllable finetuning via a novel constraint optimization-based learning objective that ensures controllability and effectively counteracts catastrophic forgetting. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Text2Data is able to achieve enhanced performance regarding both generation quality and controllability across various modalities, including molecules, motions and time series, when compared to existing baselines.

Author context

Most prolific author: 10 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 32 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 49% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)