PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

NDIM: Neuronal Diversity Inspired Model for Multisensory Emotion Recognition

Qixin Wang, Chaoqiong Fan, Tianyuan Jia, Han Yuyang, Xia Wu

general MLBrain-inspired LearningNeuronal DiversityMultisensery Emotion RecognitionCross-sensory Interaction
2.90100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.27)
3.60100
Mimo
band ≈ ±18 pct pts (from σ = 0.35)
2.70100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Without cross-sensory interaction, a key aspect of multisensory emotion recognition, traditional deep learning methods exhibit inferior performance in this task. On the contrary, the human brain possesses an inherent and remarkable capacity for multisensory recognition. Its diverse neurons exhibit distinct responses to sensory inputs, thus facilitating cross-sensory interaction. Leveraging this superiority, we propose the Neuronal Diversity Inspired Model (NDIM), which incorporates both unisensory and multisensory neurons, aligning with the human brain. To mirror the diverse response characteristics exhibited by various neurons, we introduce innovative connection constraints to regulate feature transmission between neurons. Drawing inspiration from this novel concept of neuronal diversity, our model exhibits biological plausibility, facilitating more effective emotion recognition of multisensory information. Experiments on the RAVDESS and eNTERFAVE'05 datasets show that the NDIM achieves the best accuracy of 99.63\% and 98.45\%, respectively, demonstrating the potential of neuronal-diversity-inspired approaches in advancing multisensory interaction and emotion recognition.

Author context

Most prolific author: 3 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 40 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 34% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 40)