PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

ProtoNMF: Turning a Black Box into a Prototype Based Interpretable Model via Non-negative Matrix Factorization

Andong Tan, Hao Chen

self/semi-supervised learningXAIprototype based inherently interpretable modelnon-negative matrix factorization
18.90100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.31)
28.10100
Mimo
band ≈ ±23 pct pts (from σ = 0.46)
19.20100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Models using parts of images as prototypes for interpretable image classification are receiving increasing attention due to their abilities to provide a transparent reasoning process in a "this looks like that" manner. However, existing models are typically constructed by incorporating an additional prototype layer before the final classification head, which often involve complex multi-stage training procedures and intricate loss designs while under-performing their black box counterparts in terms of accuracy. In order to guarantee the recognition performance, we take the first step to explore the reverse direction and investigate how to turn a trained black box model into the form of a prototype based model. To this end, we propose to leverage the Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) to discover interpretable prototypes due to its capability of yielding parts based representations. Then we use these prototypes as the basis to reconstruct the trained black box's classification head via linear convex optimization for transparent reasoning. Denote the reconstruction difference as the residual prototype, all discovered prototypes together guarantee a precise final reconstruction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prototype based model that guarantees the recognition performance on par with black boxes for interpretable image classification. We demonstrate that our simple strategy can easily turn a trained black box into a prototype based model while discovering meaningful prototypes in various benchmark datasets and networks.

Author context

Most prolific author: 3 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 30 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 42% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)