Consensus Optimization at Representation: Improving Personalized Federated Learning via Data-Centric Regularization
Heng Zhu, Arya Mazumdar
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We proposed, and theoretically and experimentally verified, a personalized federated learning algorithm. The main step in the algorithm is to introduce a data-centric regularization term to force consensus at the representation level.
Abstract
Federated learning is a large scale machine learning training paradigm where data is distributed across clients, and can be highly heterogeneous from one client to another. To ensure personalization in client models, and at the same time to ensure that the local models have enough commonality (i.e., prevent ``client-drift''), it has been recently proposed to cast the federated learning problem as a consensus optimization problem, where local models are trained on local data, but are forced to be similar via a regularization term. In this paper we propose an improved federated learning algorithm, where we ensure consensus optimization at the representation part of each local client, and not on whole local models. This algorithm naturally takes into account that today's deep networks are often partitioned into a feature extraction part (representation) and a prediction part. Our algorithm ensures greater flexibility compared to previous works on exact shared representation in highly heterogeneous settings, as it has been seen that the representation part can differ substantially with data distribution. Our method is quite stable to noise, and can be made differentially private with strong privacy guarantee without much loss of accuracy. We provide a complete convergence analysis of our algorithm under general nonconvex loss functions, and validate its good performance experimentally in standard datasets.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 30 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 49% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Accelerating Retrieval-augmented Language … ×6
- ▼ lost to Performance Gaps in Multi-view Clustering … ×4
- ▲ beat ProtoNMF: Turning a Black Box into a Proto… ×4
- ▼ lost to Rethinking One-vs-the-Rest Loss for Instan… ×4
- ▲ beat BWS: Best Window Selection Based on Sample… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)