TimelyGPT: Recurrent Convolutional Transformer for Long Time-series Representation
Ziyang Song, Qincheng Lu, Hao Xu, Yue Li
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — Pre-train tansformer with recurrent attention and convolution modules for long sequence time-series
Abstract
Pre-trained models (PTMs) have gained prominence in Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision domains. When it comes to time-series PTMs, their development has been limited. Previous research on time-series transformers has mainly been devoted to small-scale tasks, yet these models have not consistently outperformed traditional models. Additionally, the performance of these transformers on large-scale data remains unexplored. These findings raise doubts about Transformer's capabilities to scale up and capture temporal dependencies. In this study, we re-examine time-series transformers and identify the shortcomings of prior studies. Drawing from these insights, we then introduce a pioneering architecture called Timely Generative Pre-trained Transformer (TimelyGPT). This architecture integrates recurrent attention and temporal convolution modules to effectively capture global-local temporal dependencies in long sequences. The relative position embedding with time decay can effectively deal with trend and periodic patterns from time-series. Our experiments show that TimelyGPT excels in modeling continuously monitored biosignal as well as irregularly-sampled time-series data commonly observed in longitudinal electronic health records. This breakthrough suggests a priority shift in time-series deep learning research, moving from small-scale modeling from scratch to large-scale pre-training.
Author context
Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 41% of matchups.
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)