PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Tag2Text: Guiding Vision-Language Model via Image Tagging

Xinyu Huang, Youcai Zhang, Jinyu Ma, Weiwei Tian, Rui Feng, Yuejie Zhang, Yaqian Li, Yandong Guo, Lei Zhang

representation learningImage RecognitionVision-Language PretrainingImage Tagging
62.80100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
62.30100
Mimo
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.38)
56.00100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — This paper presents Tag2Text, a strong image recognition model which achieves a superior tagging ability and effectively enhances vision-language tasks.

Abstract

This paper presents Tag2Text, a vision language pre-training (VLP) framework, which introduces image tagging into vision-language models to guide the learning of visual-linguistic features. In contrast to prior works which utilize object tags either manually labeled or automatically detected with a limited detector, our approach utilizes tags parsed from its paired text to learn an image tagger and meanwhile provides guidance to vision-language models. Given that, Tag2Text can utilize large-scale annotation-free image tags in accordance with image-text pairs, and provides more diverse tag categories beyond objects. Strikingly, Tag2Text showcases the ability of a foundational image tagging model, with superior zero-shot performance even comparable to full supervision manner. Moreover, by leveraging tagging guidance, Tag2Text effectively enhances the performance of vision-language models on both generation-based and alignment-based tasks. Across a wide range of downstream benchmarks, Tag2Text achieves state-of-the-art results with similar model sizes and data scales, demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed tagging guidance.

Author context

Most prolific author: 11 submissions (credibility 0.92).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)