PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Conformal Normalization in Recurrent Neural Network of Grid Cells

Dehong Xu, Ruiqi Gao, Wenhao Zhang, Xue-Xin Wei, Ying Nian Wu

neuro & cogsciGrid cellsPosition embeddingConformal isometryPath integration
76.70100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
58.70100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)
83.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We propose a simple and general conformal normalization for recurrent neural networks of grid cells that results in the emergence of hexagon patterns.

Abstract

Grid cells in the entorhinal cortex of the mammalian brain exhibit striking hexagon firing patterns in their response maps as the animal (e.g., a rat) navigates in a 2D open environment. The responses of the population of grid cells collectively form a vector in a high-dimensional neural activity space, and this vector represents the self-position of the agent in the 2D physical space. As the agent moves, the vector is transformed by a recurrent neural network that takes the velocity of the agent as input. In this paper, we propose a simple and general conformal normalization of the input velocity for the recurrent neural network, so that the local displacement of the position vector in the high-dimensional neural space is proportional to the local displacement of the agent in the 2D physical space, regardless of the direction of the input velocity. Our numerical experiments on the minimally simple linear and non-linear recurrent networks show that conformal normalization leads to the emergence of the hexagon grid patterns. Furthermore, we derive a new theoretical understanding that connects conformal normalization to the emergence of hexagon grid patterns in navigation tasks.

Author context

Most prolific author: 8 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)