MVSFormer++: Revealing the Devil in Transformer's Details for Multi-View Stereo
Chenjie Cao, Xinlin Ren, Yanwei Fu
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We unravel the devil in the transformer for MVS in this paper, including the use of different attention types for specific MVS components, normalized 3D positional encoding, attention scaling, and other design details that impact depth estimation.
Abstract
Recent advancements in learning-based Multi-View Stereo (MVS) methods have prominently featured transformer-based models with attention mechanisms. However, existing approaches have not thoroughly investigated the profound influence of transformers on different MVS modules, resulting in limited depth estimation capabilities. In this paper, we introduce MVSFormer++, a method that prudently maximizes the inherent characteristics of attention to enhance various components of the MVS pipeline. Formally, our approach involves infusing cross-view information into the pre-trained DINOv2 model to facilitate MVS learning. Furthermore, we employ different attention mechanisms for the feature encoder and cost volume regularization, focusing on feature and spatial aggregations respectively. Additionally, we uncover that some design details would substantially impact the performance of transformer modules in MVS, including normalized 3D positional encoding, adaptive attention scaling, and the position of layer normalization. Comprehensive experiments on DTU, Tanks-and-Temples, BlendedMVS, and ETH3D validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Notably, MVSFormer++ achieves state-of-the-art performance on the challenging DTU and Tanks-and-Temples benchmarks. Codes and models are available at https://github.com/maybeLx/MVSFormerPlusPlus.
Author context
Most prolific author: 12 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 49% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Conditional Information Bottleneck Approac… ×6
- ▲ beat Reservoir Transformer at Infinite Horizon:… ×4
- ▲ beat On the Hidden Waves of Image ×4
- ▲ beat AUTOPARLLM: GNN-Guided Automatic Code Para… ×4
- ▲ beat ConvFormer: Revisiting Token-mixers for Se… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)