Uni-O4: Unifying Online and Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning with Multi-Step On-Policy Optimization
Kun LEI, Zhengmao He, Chenhao Lu, Kaizhe Hu, Yang Gao, Huazhe Xu
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We seamlessly integrate offline and online learning through an on-policy RL algorithm, attaining SOTA performance in simulated and real-world environments across both phases, all without the need for additional regularization.
Abstract
Combining offline and online reinforcement learning (RL) is crucial for efficient and safe learning. However, previous approaches treat offline and online learning as separate procedures, resulting in redundant designs and limited performance. We ask: *Can we achieve straightforward yet effective offline and online learning without introducing extra conservatism or regularization?* In this study, we propose Uni-O4, which utilizes an on-policy objective for both offline and online learning. Owning to the alignment of objectives in two phases, the RL agent can transfer between offline and online learning seamlessly. This property enhances the flexibility of the learning paradigm, allowing for arbitrary combinations of pretraining, fine-tuning, offline, and online learning. In the offline phase, specifically, Uni-O4 leverages diverse ensemble policies to address the mismatch issues between the estimated behavior policy and the offline dataset. Through a simple offline policy evaluation (OPE) approach, Uni-O4 can achieve multi-step policy improvement safely. We demonstrate that by employing the method above, the fusion of these two paradigms can yield superior offline initialization as well as stable and rapid online fine-tuning capabilities. Through real-world robot tasks, we highlight the benefits of this paradigm for rapid deployment in challenging, previously unseen real-world environments. Additionally, through comprehensive evaluations using numerous simulated benchmarks, we substantiate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both offline and offline-to-online fine-tuning learning. [Our website](uni-o4.github.io)
Author context
Most prolific author: 9 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 38 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 61% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Reverse Forward Curriculum Learning for Ex… ×8
- ▼ lost to Posterior Sampling via Langevin Monte Carl… ×6
- ▲ beat RoBERT: Low-Cost Bi-Directional Sequence M… ×4
- ▲ beat MIND: Masked and Inverse Dynamics Modeling… ×4
- ▲ beat Scaling up Trustless DNN Inference with Ze… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)