PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Accurate Retraining-free Pruning for Pretrained Encoder-based Language Models

Seungcheol Park, Hojun Choi, U Kang

representation learningRetraining-freePruningCompressionTransformers
79.60100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.31)
70.50100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
88.10100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We propose Kprune, an accurate retraining-free structured pruning algorithm for Transformers. Kprune shows up to 58%p higher F1 score than existing retraining-free pruning algorithms on the SQuAD benchmark.

Abstract

Given a pretrained encoder-based language model, how can we accurately compress it without retraining? Retraining-free structured pruning algorithms are crucial in pretrained language model compression due to their significantly reduced pruning cost and capability to prune large language models. However, existing retraining-free algorithms encounter severe accuracy degradation, as they fail to handle pruning errors, especially at high compression rates. In this paper, we propose KPrune (Knowledge-preserving pruning), an accurate retraining-free structured pruning algorithm for pretrained encoder-based language models. KPrune focuses on preserving the useful knowledge of the pretrained model to minimize pruning errors through a carefully designed iterative pruning process composed of knowledge measurement, knowledge-preserving mask search, and knowledge-preserving weight-tuning. As a result, KPrune shows significant accuracy improvements up to 58.02%p higher F1 score compared to existing retraining-free pruning algorithms under a high compression rate of 80% on the SQuAD benchmark without any retraining process.

Author context

Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)