Acoustic Prompt Tuning: Empowering Large Language Models with Audition Capabilities
Jinhua Liang, Xubo Liu, Wenwu Wang, Mark D Plumbley, Huy Phan, Emmanouil Benetos
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
The auditory system plays a substantial role in shaping the overall human perceptual experience. While prevailing large language models (LLMs) and visual language models (VLMs) have shown their promise in solving a wide variety of vision and language understanding tasks through their massive open-world knowledge and inter-task homogeneity, only a few of them can be generalised to the audio domain without compromising their domain-specific capacity. Meanwhile, a majority of existing multimodal foundation models (e.g., VLMs) structure their input sequences as [Multimedia, Question, Answer], constraining their applicability to more comprehensive tasks, such as natural language visual reasoning. In this work, we introduce Acoustic Prompt Turning (APT), an acoustic adapter leveraging a multi-task learning framework to extend LLMs and VLMs to the audio domain. APT uses an instruction-aware aligner to acquire a fixed number of acoustic embeddings by cross-attending audio feature maps generated from an audio encoder. Diverse audio-related tasks are formulated in a sequence-to-sequence manner without imposing any constraints on input sequences, and therefore, allowing APT to be seamlessly trained by combining the present multi-task learning with in-context learning. Experiments show that LLMs coupled with APT (namely APT-LLMs) achieve competitive results compared to the expert models (i.e., the networks trained on the targeted datasets) across various tasks. Additionally, we evaluate APT-LLMs to a novel audio reasoning task involving comparative analysis and summarisation of two audio clips. We also demonstrate the ability of APT to extend frozen VLMs to the audio domain, yielding promising results in the audio-visual understanding task even without finetuned on any audio-visual datasets. Our code and model weights will be released.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 44% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to FedMef: Towards Memory-efficient Federated… ×6
- ▼ lost to Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling ×4
- ▼ lost to Listen to Motion: Robustly Learning Correl… ×4
- ▼ lost to Unified Language-Vision Pretraining in LLM… ×4
- ▼ lost to LETI: Learning to Generate from Textual In… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)