PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

OTMatch: Improving Semi-Supervised Learning with Optimal Transport

Zhiquan Tan, Kaipeng Zheng, Weiran Huang

self/semi-supervised learningsemi-supervised learningimage classificationoptimal transport
41.70100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
32.90100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)
51.90100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.38)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We Introduce OTMatch, a novel semi-supervised learning algorithm that exploits the inherent relationship between classes using optimal transport, achieving state-of-the-art on several benchmarks..

Abstract

Semi-supervised learning has made remarkable strides by effectively utilizing a limited amount of labeled data while capitalizing on the abundant information present in unlabeled data. However, current algorithms often prioritize aligning image predictions with specific classes generated through self-training techniques, thereby neglecting the inherent relationships that exist within these classes. In this paper, we present a new approach called OTMatch, which leverages semantic relationships among classes by employing an optimal transport loss function. By utilizing optimal transport, our proposed method consistently outperforms established state-of-the-art methods. Notably, we observed a substantial improvement of a certain percentage in accuracy compared to the current state-of-the-art method, FreeMatch. OTMatch achieves $3.18\%$, $3.46\%$, and $1.28\%$ error rate reduction over FreeMatch on CIFAR-10 with 1 label per class, STL-10 with 4 labels per class, and ImageNet with 100 labels per class, respectively. This demonstrates the effectiveness and superiority of our approach in harnessing semantic relationships to enhance learning performance in a semi-supervised setting.

Author context

Most prolific author: 6 submissions (credibility 0.92).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)