WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents
Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Tianyue Ou, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, Graham Neubig
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — WebArena is a highly realistic and reproducible web environment designed for building useful agents for everyday life. Strong language models like GPT-4 perform significantly worse than humans on the realistic tasks in WebArena.
Abstract
With advances in generative AI, there is now potential for autonomous agents to manage daily tasks via natural language commands. However, current agents are primarily created and tested in simplified synthetic environments, leading to a disconnect with real-world scenarios. In this paper, we build an environment for language-guided agents that is highly realistic and reproducible. Specifically, we focus on agents that perform tasks on the web, and create an environment with fully functional websites from four common domains: e-commerce, social forum discussions, collaborative software development, and content management. Our environment is enriched with tools (e.g., a map) and external knowledge bases (e.g., user manuals) to encourage human-like task-solving. Building upon our environment, we release a set of benchmark tasks focusing on evaluating the functional correctness of task completions. The tasks in our benchmark are diverse, long-horizon, and designed to emulate tasks that humans routinely perform on the internet. We experiment with several baseline agents, integrating recent techniques such as reasoning before acting. The results demonstrate that solving complex tasks is challenging: our best GPT-4-based agent only achieves an end-to-end task success rate of 14.41%, significantly lower than the human performance of 78.24%. These results highlight the need for further development of robust agents, that current state-of-the-art large language models are far from perfect performance in these real-life tasks, and that \ours can be used to measure such progress.\footnote{Code, data, environment reproduction instructions, video demonstrations are available in the supplementary.}
Author context
Most prolific author: 6 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 42 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 63% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multi… ×10
- ▼ lost to IDEA: Invariant Causal Defense for Graph A… ×6
- ▲ beat OWL: A Large Language Model for IT Operati… ×4
- ▲ beat RLP: A reinforcement learning benchmark fo… ×4
- ▲ beat Off-the-Grid MARL: Datasets with Baselines… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 42)