PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning

Yiwei Li, Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Boyuan Pan, Xinglin Wang, Bin Sun, Heda Wang, Kan Li

general MLSelf-consistencyChain-of-ThoughtsMulti-Step ReasoningLarge Language Models
60.90100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.27)
52.00100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.39)
73.40100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.38)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We propose early-stopping self-consistency (ESC), a simple and scalable process which is capable of greatly reducing the cost of SC while maintaining performance.

Abstract

Self-consistency (SC) has been a widely used decoding strategy for chain-of-thought reasoning. Despite bringing significant performance improvements across a variety of multi-step reasoning tasks, it is a high-cost method that requires multiple sampling with the preset size. In this paper, we propose a simple and scalable sampling process, Early-Stopping Self-Consistency (ESC), to greatly reduce the cost of SC without sacrificing performance. On this basis, one control scheme for ESC is further derivated to dynamically choose the performance-cost balance for different tasks and models. To demonstrate ESC's effectiveness, we conducted extensive experiments on three popular categories of reasoning tasks: arithmetic, commonsense and symbolic reasoning over language models with varying scales. The empirical results show that ESC reduces the average number of sampling of chain-of-thought reasoning by a significant margin on six benchmarks, including MATH (-33.8%), GSM8K (-80.1%), StrategyQA (-76.8%), CommonsenseQA (-78.5%), Coin Flip (-84.2%) and Last Letters (-67.4%), while attaining comparable performances.

Author context

Most prolific author: 3 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 42)