← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Revisiting High-Resolution ODEs for Faster Convergence Rates

Hoomaan Maskan, Armin Eftekhari, Konstantinos C. Zygalakis, Alp Yurtsever

optimizationConvex optimizationfirst-order methodordinary differential equationaccelerated methodLyapunov functionconvergence ratesemi-implicit Eulerhigh-resolution ODEgradient minimization
88.20100
Fused
band ≈ ±16 pct pts (from σ = 0.32)
86.60100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.44)
91.60100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±23 pct pts (from σ = 0.47)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We show that high-resolution ODEs are recovered from a general ODE whose discretization reduces exactly to 1st-order accelerated methods and is used to prove faster convergence rates than the Lyapunov based results for recovered ODEs and algorithms.

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in high-resolution ordinary differential equations (HR-ODEs) for investigating the dynamics and convergence characteristics of momentum-based optimization algorithms. As a result, the literature includes a number of HR-ODEs that represent diverse methods. In this work, we demonstrate that these different HR-ODEs can be unified as special cases of a general HR-ODE model with varying parameters. In addition, by using the integral quadratic constraints from robust control theory, we introduce a general Lyapunov function for the convergence analysis of the proposed HR-ODE. Not only can a large number of popular optimization algorithms be viewed as discretizations of our general HR-ODE, but our analysis also leads to several critical improvements in the convergence guarantees of these methods, both in continuous and discrete-time settings. The notable improvements include enhanced convergence guarantees, compared to prior art, for the triple momentum method ODE in continuous-time and for the quasi hyperbolic momentum algorithm in discrete-time settings.

Author context

Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)