PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Set-based Neural Network Encoding

Bruno Andreis, Bedionita Soro, Sung Ju Hwang

representation learningNeural Network EncodingSets
26.90100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
28.80100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.40)
30.20100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We propose a set-based neural network encoder for predicting the performance of trained neural networks given access only to model parameters.

Abstract

We propose an approach to neural network weight encoding for generalization performance prediction that utilizes set-to-set and set-to-vector functions to efficiently encode neural network parameters. Our approach is capable of encoding neural networks in a modelzoo of mixed architecture and different parameter sizes as opposed to previous approaches that require custom encoding models for different architectures. Furthermore, our \textbf{S}et-based \textbf{N}eural network \textbf{E}ncoder (SNE) takes into consideration the hierarchical computational structure of neural networks by utilizing a layer-wise encoding scheme that culminates to encoding all layer-wise encodings to obtain the neural network encoding vector. Additionally, we introduce a \textit{pad-chunk-encode} pipeline to efficiently encode neural network layers that is adjustable to computational and memory constraints. We also introduce two new tasks for neural network generalization performance prediction: cross-dataset and cross-architecture. In cross-dataset performance prediction, we evaluate how well performance predictors generalize across modelzoos trained on different datasets but of the same architecture. In cross-architecture performance prediction, we evaluate how well generalization performance predictors transfer to modelzoos of different architecture. Experimentally, we show that SNE outperforms the relevant baselines on the cross-dataset task and provide the first set of results on the cross-architecture task.

Author context

Most prolific author: 13 submissions (credibility 0.57).

Delta if applied: -0.2 percentile

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 36 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 44% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)