PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Amortising the Gap between Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Video Instance Segmentation

Qing Zhong, Peng-Tao Jiang, Wen Wang, Hao Chen, Chengxiang Fan, Lin Yuanbo Wu

representation learningVideo instance segmentationInstance segmentationAugmentationPseudo Video
42.00100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
38.40100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
45.50100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.37)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Video Instance Segmentation (VIS) development heavily relies on fine-tuning pre-trained models initially trained on images. However, there is often a significant gap between the pre-training on images and fine-tuning for video, which needs to be noticed. In order to effectively bridge this gap, we present a novel approach known as ``\textit{video pre-training}'' to achieve substantial improvements in VIS. Notably, our approach has enhanced performance on complex video datasets involving intricate instance relationships. Our primary contribution is minimizing disparities between the pre-training and fine-tuning stages at both the data and modeling levels. Specifically, we introduce the concept of consistent pseudo-video augmentations to enrich data diversity while maintaining instance prediction consistency across both stages. Additionally, at the modeling level for pre-training, we incorporate multi-scale temporal modules to enhance the model's understanding of temporal aspects, allowing it to better adapt to object variations and facilitate contextual integration. One of the strengths of our approach is its flexibility, as it can be seamlessly integrated into various segmentation methods, consistently delivering performance improvements. Across prominent VIS benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms all state-of-the-art methods. For instance, when using a ResNet-50 as a backbone, our approach achieves a remarkable 4.0\% increase in average precision (AP) on the most challenging VIS benchmark, OVIS, setting a new record. The code will be made available soon.

Author context

Most prolific author: 8 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)