DeCCaF: Deferral Under Cost and Capacity Constraints Framework
Jean Vieira Alves, Diogo Leitão, Sérgio Jesus, Marco O. P. Sampaio, Pedro Saleiro, Mario A. T. Figueiredo, Pedro Bizarro
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
The \textit{learning to defer} (L2D) framework aims to improve human-AI collaboration systems by deferring decisions to humans when they are more likely to make the correct judgment than a ML classifier. Existing research in L2D overlooks key aspects of real-world systems that impede its practical adoption, such as: i) neglecting cost-sensitive scenarios; ii) requiring concurrent human predictions for every instance of the dataset in training and iii) not dealing with human capacity constraints. To address these issues, we propose the \textit{deferral under cost and capacity constraint framework} (DeCCaF). A novel L2D approach: DeCCaF employs supervised learning to model the probability of human error with less restrictive data requirements (only one expert prediction per instance), and uses constraint programming to globally minimize error cost subject to capacity constraints. We employ DeCCaF in a cost-sensitive fraud detection setting with a team of 50 synthetic fraud analysts, subject to a wide array of realistic human work capacity constraints, showing that DeCCaF significantly outperforms L2D baselines, reducing average misclassification costs by 9 \%. Our code and testbed are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/deccaf-1245/
Author context
Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 45% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Linking Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponents to … ×6
- ▲ beat A space-continuous implementation of Prope… ×4
- ▲ beat On the Hidden Waves of Image ×4
- ▲ beat Continual Memory Neurons ×4
- ▲ beat Multi-Resolution Learning with DeepONets a… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)