PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Probabilistic Graphical Model for Robust Graph Neural Networks against Noisy Labels

Qingqing Ge, Jianxiang Yu, Zeyuan Zhao, Xiang Li

self/semi-supervised learninggraph neural networklabel noiseprobabilistic graphical modelheterophilous graphs
59.70100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
56.50100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)
60.20100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We propose a novel probabilistic graphical model based framework PRGNN to solve the problem of label noise for GNNs.

Abstract

While robust graph neural networks (GNNs) have been widely studied for graph perturbation and attack, those for label noise have received significantly less attention. Most existing methods heavily rely on the label smoothness assumption to correct noisy labels, which adversely affects their performance on heterophilous graphs. Further, they generally perform poorly in high noise-rate scenarios. To address these problems, in this paper, we propose a novel probabilistic graphical model based framework PRGNN. Given a noisy label set and a clean label set, our goal is to maximize the likelihood of labels in the clean set. We first present PRGNN-v1, which generates clean labels based on graphs only in the Bayesian network. To further leverage the information of clean labels in the noisy label set, we put forward PRGNN-v2, which incorporates the noisy label set into the Bayesian network to generate clean labels. The generative process can then be used to predict labels for unlabeled nodes. We conduct extensive experiments to show the robustness of PRGNN on varying noise types and rates, and also on graphs with different heterophilies. In particular, we show that PRGNN can lead to inspiring performance in high noise-rate situations. The implemented code is available at https://github.com/PRGNN/PRGNN.

Author context

Most prolific author: 4 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)