SARI: SIMPLISTIC AVERAGE AND ROBUST IDENTIFICATION BASED NOISY PARTIAL LABEL LEARNING
Darshana Saravanan, Naresh Manwani, Vineet Gandhi
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly-supervised learning paradigm where each training instance is paired with a set of candidate labels (partial label), one of which is the true label. Noisy PLL (NPLL) relaxes this constraint by allowing some partial labels to not contain the true label, enhancing the practicality of the problem. Our work centers on NPLL and presents a minimalistic framework called SARI that initially assigns pseudo-labels to images by exploiting the noisy partial labels through a weighted nearest neighbour algorithm. These pseudo-label and image pairs are then used to train a deep neural network classifier with label smoothing and standard regularization techniques. The classifier's features and predictions are subsequently employed to refine and enhance the accuracy of pseudo-labels. SARI combines the strengths of Average Based Strategies (in pseudo labelling) and Identification Based Strategies (in classifier training) from the literature. We perform thorough experiments on four datasets and compare SARI against nine NPLL and PLL methods from the prior art. SARI achieves state-of-the-art results in all studied settings, obtaining substantial gains in fine-grained classification and extreme noise settings.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 30 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 47% of matchups.
- ▲ beat TABLEYE: SEEING SMALL TABLES THROUGH THE L… ×4
- ▼ lost to ADDP: Learning General Representations for… ×4
- ▼ lost to BECLR: Batch Enhanced Contrastive Few-Shot… ×4
- ▼ lost to Offline Imitation Learning without Auxilia… ×4
- ▼ lost to On the Joint Interaction of Models, Data, … ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)