Learning Deep Improvement Representation to Accelerate Evolutionary Optimization
Songbai Liu, zeyi wang, Qiuzhen Lin, Jianqiang Li, KC Tan
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Evolutionary algorithms excel at versatile optimization for complex (e.g., multiobjective) problems but can be computationally expensive, especially in high-dimensional scenarios, and their stochastic nature of search may hinder swift convergence to global optima in promising directions. In this study, we train a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to learn the improvement representation of transitioning from poor-performing to better-performing solutions during evolutionary search, facilitating the rapid convergence of the evolutionary population towards global optimality along more promising paths. Then, through the iterative stacking of the previously trained lightweight MLP, a larger model can be constructed, enabling it to acquire deep improvement representations (DIR) for solutions. Conducting evolutionary search within the acquired DIR space significantly expedites the population's convergence rate. Finally, the efficacy of DIR-guided search is validated by applying it to the two prevailing evolutionary operators—simulated binary crossover and differential evolution. The experimental findings demonstrate its capability to achieve rapid convergence in solving challenging large-scale multiobjective optimization problems.
Author context
Most prolific author: 5 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 36 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 35% of matchups.
- ▲ beat OPTIMIZING STABILIZATION IN SINGULARLY PER… ×10
- ▲ beat Culture in Artificial Intelligence: A Lite… ×6
- ▲ beat Forward Explanation : Why Catastrophic For… ×6
- ▼ lost to Randomized Benchmarking of Local Zeroth-Or… ×6
- ▲ beat A Generalized Convolutional Neural Network… ×6
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)