PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Learning Deep Improvement Representation to Accelerate Evolutionary Optimization

Songbai Liu, zeyi wang, Qiuzhen Lin, Jianqiang Li, KC Tan

optimizationLearning Improvement RepresentationAccelerated Evolutionary SearchLarge-Scale Multiobjective Optimization
2.20100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
2.30100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)
1.90100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms excel at versatile optimization for complex (e.g., multiobjective) problems but can be computationally expensive, especially in high-dimensional scenarios, and their stochastic nature of search may hinder swift convergence to global optima in promising directions. In this study, we train a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to learn the improvement representation of transitioning from poor-performing to better-performing solutions during evolutionary search, facilitating the rapid convergence of the evolutionary population towards global optimality along more promising paths. Then, through the iterative stacking of the previously trained lightweight MLP, a larger model can be constructed, enabling it to acquire deep improvement representations (DIR) for solutions. Conducting evolutionary search within the acquired DIR space significantly expedites the population's convergence rate. Finally, the efficacy of DIR-guided search is validated by applying it to the two prevailing evolutionary operators—simulated binary crossover and differential evolution. The experimental findings demonstrate its capability to achieve rapid convergence in solving challenging large-scale multiobjective optimization problems.

Author context

Most prolific author: 5 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)