BOWLL: A DECEPTIVELY SIMPLE OPEN WORLD LIFELONG LEARNER
Roshni Ramanna Kamath, Rupert Mitchell, Subarnaduti Paul, Kristian Kersting, Martin Mundt
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — we introduce the first cohesive baseline for lifelong learning in an open world setting
Abstract
The quest to improve scalar performance numbers on predetermined benchmarks seems to be deeply engraved in deep learning. However, the real world is seldom carefully curated and applications are seldom limited to excelling on test sets. A practical system is generally required to recognize novel concepts, refrain from actively including uninformative data, and retain previously acquired knowledge throughout its lifetime. Despite these key elements being rigorously researched individually, the study of their conjunction, open world lifelong learning, is only a recent trend. To accelerate this multifaceted field’s exploration, we introduce its first monolithic and much-needed baseline. Leveraging the ubiquitous use of batch normalization across deep neural networks, we propose a deceptively simple yet highly effective way to repurpose standard models for open world lifelong learning. Through extensive empirical evaluation, we highlight why our approach should serve as a future standard for models that are able to effectively maintain their knowledge, selectively focus on informative data, and accelerate future learning.
Author context
Most prolific author: 9 submissions (credibility 0.97).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 36 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 41% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Bridging the gap between offline and onlin… ×4
- ▼ lost to Provably Efficient Learning in Partially O… ×4
- ▼ lost to Making Pre-trained Language Models Great o… ×4
- ▼ lost to Network Alignment with Transferable Graph … ×4
- ▼ lost to Structured Pruning Adapters ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 36)