Vibroacoustic Frequency Response Prediction with Query-based Operator Networks
Jan van Delden, Julius Schultz, Christopher Blech, Sabine C. Langer, Timo Lüddecke
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We introduce a data-driven operator network that outperforms existing methods in predicting acoustic frequency responses for vibrating plates.
Abstract
Understanding vibroacoustic wave propagation in mechanical structures like airplanes, cars and houses is crucial to ensure health and comfort of their users. To analyze such systems, designers and engineers primarily consider the dynamic response in the frequency domain, which is computed through expensive numerical simulations like the finite element method. In contrast, data-driven surrogate models offer the promise of speeding up these simulations, thereby facilitating tasks like design optimization, uncertainty quantification, and design space exploration. We present a structured benchmark for a representative vibroacoustic problem: Predicting the frequency response for vibrating plates with varying forms of beadings. The benchmark features a total of 12,000 plate geometries with an associated numerical solution and introduces evaluation metrics to quantify the prediction quality. To address the frequency response prediction task, we propose a novel frequency query operator model, which is trained to map plate geometries to frequency response functions. By integrating principles from operator learning and implicit models for shape encoding, our approach effectively addresses the prediction of resonance peaks of frequency responses. We evaluate the method on our vibrating-plates benchmark and find that it outperforms DeepONets, Fourier Neural Operators and more traditional neural network architectures. Code and dataset: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FRONet-5536
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 48% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to Complete and continuous representations of… ×6
- ▲ beat Detecting Shortcuts using Mutual Informati… ×6
- ▲ beat BenthIQ: a Transformer-Based Benthic Class… ×4
- ▼ lost to Better Neural PDE Solvers Through Data-Fre… ×4
- ▲ beat From Fourier to Neural ODEs: Flow matching… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)