← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

($\texttt{PASS}$) Visual Prompt Locates Good Structure Sparisty through a Recurent HyperNetwork

Tianjin Huang, Meng Fang, Li Shen, Fan Liu, Yulong Pei, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Shiwei Liu, Tianlong Chen

general MLChannel PrunningVisual PromptSparse Neural Network
37.20100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
28.50100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
54.20100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We proposed a novel method $\textit{i.e.}$, $\texttt{PASS}$ that is a tailored hyper-network to take both visual prompts and network weight statistics as input, and output layer-wise channel sparsity in a recurrent manner.

Abstract

Large-scale neural networks have demonstrated remarkable performance in different domains like vision and language processing, although at the cost of massive computation resources. As illustrated by compression literature, structured model pruning is a prominent algorithm to encourage model efficiency, thanks to its acceleration-friendly sparsity patterns. One of the key questions of structural pruning is how to estimate the channel significance. In parallel, work on data-centric AI has shown that prompting-based techniques enable impressive generalization of large language models across diverse downstream tasks. In this paper, we investigate a charming possibility - *leveraging visual prompts to capture the channel importance and derive high-quality structural sparsity*. To this end, we propose a novel algorithmic framework, namely \texttt{PASS}. It is a tailored hyper-network to take both visual prompts and network weight statistics as input, and output layer-wise channel sparsity in a recurrent manner. Such designs consider the intrinsic channel dependency between layers. Comprehensive experiments across multiple network architectures and six datasets demonstrate the superiority of $\texttt{PASS}$ in locating good structural sparsity. For example, at the same FLOPs level, $\texttt{PASS}$ subnetworks achieve 1\%$\sim$3\% better accuracy on Food101 dataset; or with a similar performance of 80\% accuracy, $\texttt{PASS}$ subnetworks obtain 0.35$\times$ more speedup than the baselines. Codes are provided in the supplements.

Author context

Most prolific author: 22 submissions (credibility 0.57).

Delta if applied: -0.2 percentile

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 32 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 45% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)