Large Content And Behavior Models To Understand, Simulate, And Optimize Content And Behavior
Ashmit Khandelwal, Aditya Agrawal, Aanisha Bhattacharyya, Yaman Kumar, Somesh Singh, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Ishita Dasgupta, Stefano Petrangeli, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Changyou Chen, Balaji Krishnamurthy
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Shannon and Weaver's seminal information theory divides communication into three levels: technical, semantic, and effectiveness. While the technical level deals with the accurate reconstruction of transmitted symbols, the semantic and effectiveness levels deal with the inferred meaning and its effect on the receiver. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their wide generalizability, make some progress towards the second level. However, LLMs and other communication models are not conventionally designed for predicting and optimizing communication for desired receiver behaviors and intents. As a result, the effectiveness level remains largely untouched by modern communication systems. In this paper, we introduce the receivers' "behavior tokens," such as shares, likes, clicks, purchases, and retweets, in the LLM's training corpora to optimize content for the receivers and predict their behaviors. Other than showing similar performance to LLMs on content understanding tasks, our trained models show generalization capabilities on the behavior dimension for behavior simulation, content simulation, behavior understanding, and behavior domain adaptation. We show results on all these capabilities using a wide range of tasks on three corpora. We call these models Large Content and Behavior Models (LCBMs). Further, to spur more research on LCBMs, we release our new Content Behavior Corpus (CBC), a repository containing communicator, message, and corresponding receiver behavior (https://behavior-in-the-wild.github.io/LCBM).
Author context
Most prolific author: 5 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 28 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 41% of matchups.
- ▼ lost to DreamClean: Restoring Clean Image Using De… ×4
- ▼ lost to Stay on Topic with Classifier-Free Guidanc… ×4
- ▼ lost to Universal Sleep Decoder: Aligning awake an… ×4
- ▼ lost to MedJourney: Counterfactual Medical Image G… ×4
- ▼ lost to Explaining black box text modules in natur… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 28)