← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Regulating the level of manipulation in text augmentation with systematic adjustment and advanced sentence-embedding

Youhoo Cha, Younghoon Lee

datasets & benchmarksText augmentationthe level of manipulationadvanced sentence-embeddingreliable pseudo-labels
6.90100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
9.20100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.40)
5.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.45)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — This research emphasizes the importance of text augmentation and proposes a solution for the "level of manipulation" issue. It introduces a method that ensures diversity while providing reliable pseudo-labeling through advanced sentence embedding.

Abstract

Text augmentation, a method for generating samples by applying combinations, noise, and other manipulations to a small dataset, is a crucial technique in natural language processing (NLP) research. It introduced diversity into the training process, thereby enabling the construction of robust models. The level of manipulation is the most important issue in text augmentation; low-level manipulation generates data similar to the original, resulting in inefficient augmentation because it cannot ensure diversity, whereas high-level manipulation causes reliability issues for labels and degrades the model's performance. Therefore, this paper proposes a systematically adjustable text augmentation technique to address the ``level of manipulation'' issue. Specifically, it proposes a method for systematically adjusting the data candidate pool for manipulation to provide an appropriate level of randomness during the augmentation process. Furthermore, we propose an advanced sentence-embedding methodology to achieve robust pseudo-labeling at the manipulation level. In other words, we leverage combined sentence embedding, which incorporates sentence embedding, document embedding, and XAI information from the original data to assign reliable pseudo-labels. We conducted performance comparisons with existing text augmentation approaches to validate the effectiveness of our proposed methodology. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves the highest performance improvement across all the experimental datasets

Author context

Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)