PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Maximum Entropy On-Policy Actor-Critic via Entropy Advantage Estimation

Jean Seong Bjorn Choe, Jong-Kook Kim

reinforcement learningmaximum entropy rlentropy regularizationpolicy optimizationgeneralization
46.00100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.29)
47.20100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.42)
55.80100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We present a practical on-policy MaxEnt RL algorithm.

Abstract

Entropy regularisation is a widely adopted technique that enhances policy optimisation performance and stability. Many practical on-policy methods employ an entropy regularisation term to the policy gradient, thereby maximising policy entropy at visited states. On the other hand, another form of entropy regularisation, maximum entropy reinforcement learning (MaxEnt RL), augments the standard objective with an entropy term, aiming to maximise both the cumulative reward and the entropy of the trajectories induced by a policy. However, despite its empirical and theoretical achievements, its application in on-policy actor-critic contexts remains relatively underexplored. In this work, we propose an on-policy actor-critic algorithm based on the MaxEnt RL framework. A key aspect of our approach is separating the entropy objective from the MaxEnt RL objective. This delineation allows us to introduce an additional critic for the entropy objective alongside the conventional value critic. It also offers finer control over the optimisation process, incorporating a discount factor specifically for the entropy that provides a distinct way to balance the original and entropy objectives. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that extending Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) and replacing its entropy regularisation with the proposed method significantly improves the performance of PPO in both continuous control tasks and across 16 Procgen environments. Additionally, the results underline MaxEnt RL's capacity to enhance generalisation.

Author context

Most prolific author: 1 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 34 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 50% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)