PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

NeuralFuse: Learning to Recover the Accuracy of Access-Limited Neural Network Inference in Low-Voltage Regimes

Hao-Lun Sun, Lei Hsiung, Nandhini Chandramoorthy, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi Ho

neurosymbolic AImachine learningenergy efficient inferencebit error resilience
72.40100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.28)
64.50100
Mimo
band ≈ ±21 pct pts (from σ = 0.43)
79.20100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±19 pct pts (from σ = 0.37)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — NeuralFuse provides model-independent protection for AI accelerators built on a chip, allowing them to maintain stable performance when suffering low-voltage-induced bit errors.

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become ubiquitous in machine learning, but their energy consumption remains a notable issue. Lowering the supply voltage is an effective strategy for reducing energy consumption. However, aggressively scaling down the supply voltage can lead to accuracy degradation due to random bit flips in static random access memory (SRAM) where model parameters are stored. To address this challenge, we introduce NeuralFuse, a novel add-on module that addresses the accuracy-energy tradeoff in low-voltage regimes by learning input transformations to generate error-resistant data representations. NeuralFuse protects DNN accuracy in both nominal and low-voltage scenarios. Moreover, NeuralFuse is easy to implement and can be readily applied to DNNs with limited access, such as non-configurable hardware or remote access to cloud-based APIs. Experimental results demonstrate that, at a 1% bit error rate, NeuralFuse can reduce SRAM memory access energy by up to 24% while recovering accuracy by up to 57%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first model-agnostic approach (i.e., no model retraining) to address low-voltage-induced bit errors.

Author context

Most prolific author: 18 submissions (credibility 0.86).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 38)