← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

Semi-HyperGraph Benchmark: Enhancing Flexibility of Hypergraph Learning with Datasets and Benchmarks

Zehui Li, Xiangyu Zhao, Mingzhu Shen, Guy-Bart Stan, Pietro Lio, Yiren Zhao

datasets & benchmarksGraph Neural NetworksHypergraph LearningDatasets and Benchmarks
23.30100
Fused
band ≈ ±14 pct pts (from σ = 0.27)
22.90100
Mimo
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)
26.10100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±18 pct pts (from σ = 0.37)

OpenReview ground truth

Rejected

TL;DR — We introduce a useful and flexible extension of hypergraphs by including simple edges, and present the Semi-HyperGraph Benchmark (SHGB), a collection of datasets combining hypergraphs and simple edges, with an extensible evaluation framework.

Abstract

Graphs are widely used to encapsulate a variety of data formats, but real-world networks often involve complex node relations beyond only being pairwise. While hypergraphs have been developed and employed to account for the complex node relations, they reduce the flexibility of machine learning systems by totally disregarding simple edges, which to some extent leads to a drop in performance. Additionally, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) research are normally separated into simple graphs and hypergraphs, and these two classes of methods tend not to interchange. Therefore, there is a need for a more flexible benchmark that allows GNNs to employ both simple edge and hyperedge information. In this paper, we present the *Semi-HyperGraph Benchmark (SHGB)*, a collection of comprehensive datasets combining hypergraphs and simple edges, with an accessible evaluation framework to fully understand the performance of GNNs on complex graphs. SHGB contains 23 real-world hypergraph datasets with simple edges included, across various domains such as biology, social media, and e-commerce. Furthermore, we provide an extensible evaluation framework and a supporting codebase to facilitate the training and evaluation of GNNs on SHGB. Our empirical study of existing GNNs on SHGB reveals various research opportunities and gaps, including (1) evaluating the actual performance improvement of hypergraph GNNs over simple graph GNNs; (2) comparing the impact of different sampling strategies on hypergraph learning methods; and (3) exploring ways to integrate simple edge and hyperedge information. We make our source code and full datasets publicly available at https://anonymous-url/.

Author context

Most prolific author: 11 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 40)