Learning interpretable control inputs and dynamics underlying animal locomotion
Thomas Soares Mullen, Marine Schimel, Guillaume Hennequin, Christian K. Machens, Michael Orger, Adrien Jouary
OpenReview ground truth
TL;DR — We proposed a novel approach to modeling time series of behavior observations by combining two existing methods in order to learn a reduced and interpretable model of behavioral dynamics
Abstract
A central objective in neuroscience is to understand how the brain orchestrates movement. Recent advances in automated tracking technologies have made it possible to document behavior with unprecedented temporal resolution and scale, generating rich datasets which can be exploited to gain insights into the neural control of movement. One common approach is to identify stereotypical motor primitives using cluster analysis. However, this categorical description can limit our ability to model the effect of more continuous control schemes. Here we take a control theoretic approach to behavioral modeling and argue that movements can be understood as the output of a controlled dynamical system. Previously, models of movement dynamics, trained solely on behavioral data, have been effective in reproducing observed features of neural activity. These models addressed specific scenarios where animals were trained to execute particular movements upon receiving a prompt. In this study, we extend this approach to analyze the full natural locomotor repertoire of an animal: the zebrafish larva. Our findings demonstrate that this repertoire can be effectively generated through a sparse control signal driving a latent Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Our model's learned latent space preserves key kinematic features and disentangles different categories of movements. To further interpret the latent dynamics, we used balanced model reduction to yield a simplified model. Collectively, our methods serve as a case study for interpretable system identification, and offer a novel framework for understanding neural activity in relation to movement.
Author context
Most prolific author: 2 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 32 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 46% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Maximizing Benefits under Harm Constraints… ×6
- ▼ lost to Privileged Sensing Scaffolds Reinforcement… ×4
- ▼ lost to Non-Asymptotic Analysis for Single-Loop (N… ×4
- ▼ lost to Deep Neural Networks Can Learn Generalizab… ×4
- ▼ lost to Learn from the Past: A Proxy based Adversa… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 32)