PapersWithELO
← ICLR 2024 leaderboard

InstructScene: Instruction-Driven 3D Indoor Scene Synthesis with Semantic Graph Prior

Chenguo Lin, Yadong MU

generative models3D indoor scene synthesiscontrollable generative modelsgraph diffusion models
74.50100
Fused
band ≈ ±15 pct pts (from σ = 0.30)
64.10100
Mimo
band ≈ ±22 pct pts (from σ = 0.44)
85.30100
DeepSeek
band ≈ ±20 pct pts (from σ = 0.41)

OpenReview ground truth

Accepted

TL;DR — We propose to synthesize 3D indoor scenes from instructions by integrating a semantic graph prior and a layout decoder, significantly improving generation controllability and fidelity.

Abstract

Comprehending natural language instructions is a charming property for 3D indoor scene synthesis systems. Existing methods directly model object joint distributions and express object relations implicitly within a scene, thereby hindering the controllability of generation. We introduce InstructScene, a novel generative framework that integrates a semantic graph prior and a layout decoder to improve controllability and fidelity for 3D scene synthesis. The proposed semantic graph prior jointly learns scene appearances and layout distributions, exhibiting versatility across various downstream tasks in a zero-shot manner. To facilitate the benchmarking for text-driven 3D scene synthesis, we curate a high-quality dataset of scene-instruction pairs with large language and multimodal models. Extensive experimental results reveal that the proposed method surpasses existing state-of-the-art approaches by a large margin. Thorough ablation studies confirm the efficacy of crucial design components. Project page: https://chenguolin.github.io/projects/InstructScene.

Author context

Most prolific author: 4 submissions (credibility 1.00).

No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).

Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.

Ranking trajectory

Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.

Battle history — 34 comparisons

Ranked above opponent in 61% of matchups.

Judge assessments

Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)