Lightweight Graph Neural Network Search with Graph Sparsification
Beini Xie, Heng Chang, Ziwei Zhang, Zeyang Zhang, Simin Wu, Xin Wang, Yuan Meng, Wenwu Zhu
OpenReview ground truth
Abstract
Graph Neural Architecture Search (GNAS) has achieved superior performance on various graph-structured tasks. However, existing GNAS studies overlook the applications of GNAS in resource-constraint scenarios. This paper proposes to design a joint graph data and architecture mechanism, which identifies important sub-architectures via the valuable graph data. To search for optimal lightweight Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), we propose Lightweight Graph Neural Architecture Search with Graph SparsIfication and Network Pruning (GASSIP). In particular, GASSIP comprises an operation-pruned architecture search module to enable efficient lightweight GNN search. Meanwhile, we design a novel curriculum graph data sparsification module with an architecture-aware edge-removing difficulty measurement to help select optimal sub-architectures. With the aid of two differentiable masks, we iteratively optimize these two modules to efficiently search for the optimal lightweight architecture. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of GASSIP. Particularly, our method achieves on-par or even higher node classification performance with half or fewer model parameters of searched GNNs and a sparser graph.
Author context
Most prolific author: 5 submissions (credibility 1.00).
No mass-submission penalty for this paper (authors within normal submission volume).
Aggregate statistics only — no individual author rankings.
Ranking trajectory
Percentile by tournament round — convergence indicates rating stability.
Battle history — 34 comparisons
Ranked above opponent in 41% of matchups.
- ▲ beat Iterative Graph Neural Network Enhancement… ×4
- ▼ lost to Network Alignment with Transferable Graph … ×4
- ▼ lost to Scalable and Effective Implicit Graph Neur… ×4
- ▲ beat Generalized Convergence Analysis of Tsetli… ×4
- ▼ lost to Bringing robotics taxonomies to continuous… ×4
Judge assessments
Mean overall score 0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 34)